All of a sudden my right-wing conservative son has become a complete and total socialist.
And while he would scoff at the idea of state-owned farms, socialized medicine or or other hallmarks of communist nations, he still carries the baggage of being a proponant of redistribution of wealth.
What caused this sudden shift in political philosophy? When did he drink the Obama Cool-Aid and suddenly want those with abundance to give all they have to those without? It was the day his younger brother came home from a community service project with a huge bag filled with stale candy.
"It's not fair," I heard my son, whom I will now refer to as Che, say. "Dad. Make him share."
It didn't stop there. Soon all sorts of items were being discussed as puplic property (meaning they should now be his since one of his siblings had something he didn't).
"You took Chad to Boston Market!! Now you have to take me."
"The girls have to give us all their cupcakes because we want some too."
"Who ate all the cake? I only had five pieces."
You will notice most, if not all, of his socialist tendencies are toward food. He is a growing teenager and all he does now is eat, sleep and email girls on Facebook, but he is still acting as a socialist. How else did socialism start if not by someone feeling inadequate because someone else had more than they did, so they made rules and regulations to take from those who had plenty and give it to the government who squanders it all so no one has anything.
It reminds me of the discussion Che had with his social studies teacher around the time of the 2008 elections. They were discussing Obama resurrecting the old Hughie Long argument of a chicken in every pot.
"We are instituting a new rule in this school," the teacher said. "We don't think its fair some of you are getting A grades and others are just getting Cs. We are going to take the grades away from the A students and share them with the C students so everyone will get Bs."
"That's not fair," the students argued. "We worked hard for our grades. If they want A grades they have to do the work." (Ironically, since we live in the Boulder Valley School District in Colorado, many of the loudest protestors were all good little Democrats, not the hard core Republicans that usually make that argument.)
As I have discovered, in most cases true socialists (or liberals) are people interested most in lining their own nests (or stomaches) at the expense of other people's work. On the other hand, most conservatives are people who work hard for what they get and then work even harder to keep others from taking it away from them.
Personally, I am seeking a happy medium where I have enough to give to other without worrying if anyone else has any more than I do.
Che has a more direct approach.
"What's for dinner?"
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
my standpoint is only in place when the work is evenly distibuted and the wealth is not. if everybody does the same work, but only one gets paid, i have a problem. and any scocialist views i may have i got from mom.
yang lebih ekonomis adalah menghasilkan layanan dan produk pribadi Anda yang harganya hampir tidak ada sama sekali dan biasanya tidak termasuk bahan kimia yang berbahaya.
asikqq
dewaqq
sumoqq
interqq
pionpoker
pelangiqq
hobiqq
paito warna terlengkap
http://199.30.55.59/hobiqq78/
datahk 2019
Post a Comment